|
Executive Speeches

Testimony of Eugene W. Zeltmann, president
and chief operating officer, New York Power Authority, and Co-Chairman,
Electric Vehicle Association of the Americas, before the Senate Energy and
Natural Resources Committee, Washington, D. C.
July 17, 2001
Mr. Chairman, and members of the Committee, I am Gene
Zeltmann, President and Chief Operating Officer of the New York Power
Authority (NYPA). The Power Authority is America’s largest state-owned
public power enterprise, operating 10 generating facilities and more than
1,400 circuit miles of transmission lines.
I appear today as co-Chairman of the Electric Vehicle
Association of the Americas, whose membership includes international
vehicle and component manufacturers, energy providers and technology
developers. I thank you for this opportunity to discuss the role of the
federal government in reducing the use of petroleum in the light duty
vehicle sector.
EVAA believes that reducing dependence on foreign oil
demands that we transition the country’s biggest consumer of this
commodity—the transportation sector—to use of other fuels.
Electricity is an attractive alternative. It is clean, efficient,
relatively affordable and is produced domestically, from a variety of
feedstocks. And, use of electricity can greatly enhance our energy
security since today’s U.S. electric generation base is less than 3%
reliant on petroleum.
EVAA encourages the development and use of several
electric transportation modes including vehicles powered solely by
batteries; fuel cell vehicles, where the electricity is generated on
board; and, finally, hybrid electric vehicles that rely upon a small
internal combustion engine operating in conjunction with an electric
motor.
Mr. Chairman, my written statement details the benefits
of using electric transportation and describes the challenges we face in
commercializing these technologies. I will use my time this morning to
highlight actions that government might take to assist in the transition
of our transportation network to alternative fuels.
New York State has moved boldly to promote electric and
other modes of clean fuel transportation, exemplifying the role that EVAA
and its members believe government should fill.
Under the leadership of Governor George Pataki, generous
state tax credits and exemptions from the state sales tax for purchase of
vehicles have been enacted. A state environmental bond is providing
financial support for clean fuel buses and fleet vehicles. And, the
Governor has directed the state fleet, which already includes some 700
clean fuel vehicles, to operate solely on such fuels by the end of the
decade.
The Power Authority is assisting in this paradigm shift
by deploying more than 200 electric vehicles for use by our customers and
employees. We have initiated all-electric commuter programs and supported
the acquisition of several hundred hybrid electric buses. And,
importantly, we are facilitating the conversion of 500 US postal vans to
electricity.
With respect to the federal government’s role, let me
first say that EVAA supports tax incentives as the single-most effective
means of "jump-starting" the market for electric and other clean
fuel transportation options. EVAA supports the inclusion of such
incentives as a critical component to an effective national energy policy.
With respect to matters within the jurisdiction of this
Committee, EVAA urges the inclusion of several, specific items in
comprehensive energy legislation.
First, a primary factor in the current high price of
electric vehicles is the battery. Advanced batteries used to power battery
and hybrid electric EVs are expensive, due largely to the materials—like nickel—used in their manufacture. Increasing volume will assist
somewhat in lowering the price, but automotive manufacturers believe the
batteries will remain too expensive to allow for an affordable EV—even
at mass production. A second use—subsequent to service in a vehicle—is
feasible because EV battery packs retain about 80% of their rated capacity
at the end of its use in the vehicle. Studies indicate that such batteries
could be used effectively in stationary applications like electricity
storage and load-leveling. We ask that the Committee authorize a
three-year program so that electric utilities and other interested parties
could cost-share with DOE in demonstrating the cost-effectiveness and
benefits of using "spent" EV battery packs in stationary
applications.
Second, the Chairman of the House Science Committee,
Sherwood Boehlert, has introduced legislation to create a program that
would demonstrate a variety of electric and other alternative fuel
technologies in cities across the country. This forward thinking proposal
will assist in creating seamless, intermodal transportation systems in
urban environments that are fueled exclusively by clean alternatives like
electricity. Chairman Boehlert plans to include the "AFV Acceleration
Act" as part of Science Committee’s energy package and we urge this
Committee to consider incorporating this proposal in comprehensive energy
legislation as well.
Third, we ask that you examine the Energy Policy Act of
1992 provisions that require governments and so-called "fuel
provider" fleets, like electric and natural gas utilities, to acquire
alternative fuel vehicles. The current program failed to meet the EPACT
goal of reducing transportation sector petroleum use by 10%, by the year
2000. EVAA has been working with other alternative fuel groups, as well as
representatives of government and commercial fleets, to identify
modifications to existing law. We seek flexibility in meeting the
requirements of existing law in order to better ensure that EPACT’s
future petroleum displacement goal is achieved.
Finally, hydrogen could become the "fuel of
choice" in this century. Our interest in hydrogen is simple. It is
the fuel required to power fuel cell vehicles. This Committee will
consider the reauthorization of existing hydrogen R&D legislation. As
the Committee considers questions about hydrogen, about fuel cell
development, about the energy needed to power our mobile society, we urge
you to find ways to establish public and private partnerships to jointly
address these technological challenges. The federal government can play a
significant role in assuring that the vast amount of human, technical and
financial resources now being spent on hydrogen and fuel cell development
is optimized through integrated, cooperative programs and policies.
As you examine existing law and craft a new national
energy policy, we urge you to include the programs, policies and
incentives that I have outlined today to encourage the development and use
of electric modes of transportation.
That concludes my formal remarks, I thank you again, for
the opportunity to appear and I will be happy to answer any questions.
TOP |